So when Asus puts their hardware monitor that does not behave in a manner that is intuitive (I note that NO ONE here has offered to explain the inner workings behind that hardware monitor display), it should be noted somewhere clearly in the manual or within the UEFI page itself. I mean, the main demographic for this motherboard are tweakers and overclockers, and I imagine most tweakers and overclockers are used to using the BIOS monitor to check readings to see that their overclock is taking effect correctly from bootup. Unlike other hardware monitoring alternatives like Aida64, Core Temp, and MSI Afterburner, this app is free to download and install and is also available for. In other words the total possible CPU is 100, so if System Idle is 96, this leaves 4 being actually used by processes. Total CPU: 100 (100 possible - 0 idle 100) and so on. I'm not as worried now having installed an OS and put some mileage into it, and verifying expected performance.but I'm of the opinion that this is a bit of a poor design or documentation when this behavior is not mentioned anywhere in the manual. Instead we see the following: Process Explorer 50. Everything is working fine except Task Manager in Windows 10. Still, as a matter of curiosity I would like someone (waiting for an Asus rep to chime in preferably) to explain the rhyme and reason behind the Hardware Monitor readings. Clint Sagar Created on JWindows 10 Task Manager shows 100 CPU but Performance Monitor Shows less than 2 Hi Today,I have updated my PC to Windows 10 from Windows 8.1 pro. You can also confirm via CPU-Z as Praz has stated. Whatever value is stated there will be the value applied to the motherboard. The Target CPU Turbo-Mode Frequency is what you should be looking at. The higher the clock speed, the more tasks the processor can complete, and the faster. Is this expected behavior? Is the UEFI/BIOS somehow running the CPU in a slower/safer state, then running my intended targeted ratio when Windows loads? How can I make the UEFI/BIOS Hardware Monitor show the same thing as what I see in Windows? It is one of the best PC temp monitoring software that checks CPU. In the UEFI/BIOS, the Hardware Monitor is showing CPU frequency of 3.2GHz, with a 32x CPU ratio and 100MHz BCLK. I did a quick SuperPi 32M run, and see that it's finishing the run in 440 seconds, which is right around what I expect with a 4.5GHz Haswell. In Windows, both CPU-Z and HWInfo report that all my cores are running at 4.5GHz, with 45x CPU ratio and 100MHz BCLK. After installing Windows, and doing a bit more investigation, turns out the issue may be simpler. Started overclocking as soon I got the system running, without installing OS and got confused by the UEFI/BIOS. Short story: Assembled a new Haswell-E system. However, the issue has morphed into a more specific one, so I decided to create a new thread with an appropriate title. This is an offshoot from another thread I created.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |